A very interesting news that Sir sent me here is the link:
Http://www.eltiempo.com/politica/2007-05-22/ARTICULO-WEB-NOTA_INTERIOR-3565435.html
But if I am too lazy to go here I put what it says:
Doctors Only could allow tattoos or piercings in Colombia, proposed legislation that will be voted on today
Seventh Senate Commission could vote before noon on the project that requires this to prevent users of these services run health risks.
The Ministry of Health of Bogota reported last year that a good percentage of the 67 thousand people with Hepatitis C, contracted the disease after having undergone a tattoo.
is why Senator Jorge Eliecer Ballesteros, rapporteur of the project, to include the requirement of prior medical clearance.
"The user upon completion of the procedure, must undergo an assessment by a health professional, which is credited to the physical requirements for this type of procedure performed," says the bill in his article 9.
Minors, meanwhile, must be accompanied to places where they get tattoos or piercings are placed by their parents or, failing that, they carry a permit.
Some lawmakers believe that this authorization must be authenticated by a notary.
idea is a "good" in other words, the intention of it is exaclente, I think this very well that the government will pay a little attention and help us control a little health, but such measures do not are nothing, do nothing, especially not me I would do any kind of exam before getting a tattoo, everyone knows how the health and who have a problem, possibly contagious disease and not know if they know in many cases are selfish enough to get the tattoo anyway, body art is something that in itself is already quite expensive in our country (Colombia, right? ...:)) and I think these tests or revision medicasimplemente increase the cost of a tattoo or piercing, and many would pass it, plus I'm sure that 80% of the tattooists or perforadoresno require this.
To ensure that all parts of body art will require this "review" before the person to perform a tattoo or piercing should be implemented audit systems quite complex and require some investment insurance, so why not do it and otherwise regulate premises simply to comply with certain standards salubrirdad and toilet. Not to mention the fact that it is very demeaning to a person not to give the "meat" or permission to get a tattoo simply because you have hepatitis and not necessarily those contracted by sharing needles with their friends while drugged or being promiscuous, it always have said that such measures tend to label the followers and practitioners of body art and customs people unsafe to put a nice way.
repeat again, I think that regulate tattoo and piercing establishments to comply with basic standards of sterility, cleanliness and sanitation would be more shall be adequate and save us, while the education side, the most important thing is to let you know young that a piercing of 20,000 with a silver jewel, the only thing left is a scar and a bad experience as one of 60,000 or more with the right material will be something worthy of our body that we look for a long time. When our body is not worth skimping on costs, the best is never enough and save a few dollars is not reason to get into the hands of people who do not meet very basic and simple rules of hygiene, or let us handle by someone inexperienced or unscrupulous.
If you want to know where to go when getting a tattoo, read this post: "How to recognize a good study"
0 comments:
Post a Comment